ประกาศข่าว/ประชาสัมพันธ์


ข้อความที่ 30 โดย Addison_Florida วันที่ 9 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.

ข้อความที่ 29 โดย Allison_Florida วันที่ 9 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.)

ข้อความที่ 28 โดย Nevaeh_New_Jersey วันที่ 9 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
That’s fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn’t matter.

ข้อความที่ 27 โดย Emma_Nevada วันที่ 9 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
That’s fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn’t matter.

ข้อความที่ 26 โดย Anna_Wyoming วันที่ 9 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.

ข้อความที่ 25 โดย Julia_South_Dakota วันที่ 9 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :)

ข้อความที่ 24 โดย Sydney_New_York วันที่ 8 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :)

ข้อความที่ 23 โดย Alyssa_West_Virginia วันที่ 8 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was “only reading a WSJ article” on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.

ข้อความที่ 22 โดย Paige_California วันที่ 8 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.

ข้อความที่ 21 โดย Arianna_Massachusetts วันที่ 8 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*)

ข้อความที่ 20 โดย Sydney_New_York วันที่ 8 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.

ข้อความที่ 19 โดย Gianna_Texas วันที่ 8 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
In relation to the Technorati rank it’s pulled down via an API (geez I think that’s what it’s called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spreadsheet for upload.

ข้อความที่ 18 โดย Alexis_Utah วันที่ 8 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.

ข้อความที่ 17 โดย Gabriella_Vermont วันที่ 8 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate – McLame – would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.

ข้อความที่ 16 โดย Gabrielle_Illinois วันที่ 8 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.)

ข้อความที่ 15 โดย Autumn_Alabama วันที่ 8 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?

ข้อความที่ 14 โดย Faith_Wisconsin วันที่ 8 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.

ข้อความที่ 13 โดย Sophia_Virginia วันที่ 8 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.

ข้อความที่ 12 โดย Ariana_North_Dakota วันที่ 8 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
In relation to the Technorati rank it’s pulled down via an API (geez I think that’s what it’s called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spreadsheet for upload.

ข้อความที่ 11 โดย Camila_South_Carolina วันที่ 8 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.

ข้อความที่ 10 โดย Taylor_Massachusetts วันที่ 8 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.

ข้อความที่ 9 โดย Sophia_Nevada วันที่ 8 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.

ข้อความที่ 8 โดย Jasmine_Michigan วันที่ 8 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.

ข้อความที่ 7 โดย Kylie_Georgia วันที่ 8 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).

ข้อความที่ 6 โดย Kylie_Washington วันที่ 8 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
That’s fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn’t matter.

ข้อความที่ 5 โดย Emma_Virginia วันที่ 8 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.

ข้อความที่ 4 โดย Madelyn_Utah วันที่ 8 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.

ข้อความที่ 3 โดย Camila_Alabama วันที่ 8 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.

ข้อความที่ 2 โดย Amelia_Illinois วันที่ 8 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.

ข้อความที่ 1 โดย Natalia_Iowa วันที่ 8 ก.พ. 2555 IP: 183.90.170.5
I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).
หน้า [1] 2 3 4 5 6 9
เพิ่มข้อความที่นี่
(ผลการคำนวณด้านข้าง)